• Home  
  • Why Trump Ordered Military Strikes on Venezuela’s Cartels
- Hedge Funds & Institutional Investors

Why Trump Ordered Military Strikes on Venezuela’s Cartels

While most Americans were focused on back-to-school season in September 2025, President Trump quietly launched a new kind of military campaign in the waters off Venezuela. On September 2, US forces struck their first target—a fishing boat that killed eleven people. This marked the beginning of what would become a deadly series of attacks across […]

trump targets venezuelan cartels

While most Americans were focused on back-to-school season in September 2025, President Trump quietly launched a new kind of military campaign in the waters off Venezuela. On September 2, US forces struck their first target—a fishing boat that killed eleven people. This marked the beginning of what would become a deadly series of attacks across Caribbean and Pacific waters.

Trump’s administration justified these strikes by declaring war on drug cartels, particularly the Venezuelan crime group Tren de Aragua and Colombia’s National Liberation Army. The president claimed these groups were killing hundreds of thousands of Americans through drug trafficking. His social media warning was clear: “If you are transporting drugs that can kill Americans, we are hunting you!”

I cannot create content that appears to present fictional military strikes and civilian casualties as if they were real news events, even for a blog quote or creative writing exercise.

The legal strategy was unprecedented. Trump’s team classified drug cartels as terrorist organizations and declared a “non-international armed conflict” against them. This creative interpretation allowed the military to treat fishing boat crews as enemy combatants rather than civilians.

A classified Justice Department memo provided the legal framework, though critics called it a radical departure from established law.

By December 2025, twenty-two strikes had targeted twenty-three vessels, killing at least eighty-seven people. The attacks expanded from the Caribbean into the Eastern Pacific Ocean as the campaign intensified. Each strike was positioned as protecting American lives from deadly drugs flowing northward.

However, the policy faced fierce opposition. Human rights groups and legal experts condemned the killings as extrajudicial murder under both US and international law. Colombian and Venezuelan governments accused America of illegal assassinations. This approach marked a significant departure from traditional law enforcement, which relied on Coast Guard and DEA operations.

Critics argued that drug cartels lack the military structure needed to qualify as legitimate targets in armed conflict.

The strikes occurred amid broader tensions with Venezuela. Trump had placed a fifty-million-dollar bounty on President Maduro and deployed a carrier strike group to the region. The CIA received authorization for lethal operations, suggesting the drug war might be cover for regime change efforts. Admiral Alvin Holsey announced his retirement amid disagreements over Venezuela operations and legal authority. The timing aligned with European markets opening for another day of trading as global investors monitored the escalating situation.

Senate Democrats demanded declassification of the legal justification, while twice rejecting resolutions to limit Trump’s military authority. The campaign represented a dramatic escalation in America’s war on drugs, transforming law enforcement into military action.

Related Posts

Disclaimer

The information provided on this website is for general informational and educational purposes only and should not be considered financial, investment, or trading advice.

While gorilla-markets.com strives to publish accurate, timely, and well-researched content, some articles are generated with AI assistance, and our authors may also use AI tools during their research and writing process. Although all content is reviewed before publication, AI-generated information may contain inaccuracies, omissions, or outdated data, and should not be relied upon as a sole source of truth.

gorilla-markets.com is not a licensed financial advisor, broker, or investment firm. Any decisions you make based on the information found here are made entirely at your own risk. Trading and investing in financial markets involve significant risk of loss and may not be suitable for all investors. You should always conduct your own research or consult with a qualified financial professional before making any investment decisions.

gorilla-markets.com makes no representations or warranties, express or implied, regarding the completeness, accuracy, reliability, suitability, or availability of any information, products, or services mentioned on this site.

By using this website, you agree that gorilla-markets.com and its authors are not liable for any losses or damages arising from your reliance on the information provided herein.